What is the difference between a real-time spectrum analyzer and a swept spectrum analyzer?
RTSA vs Swept Analyzer
The choice between RTSA and SSA depends on whether the signals being measured are stable (SSA is fine) or dynamic/transient (RTSA is necessary).
- Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
- Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
- Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
Frequently Asked Questions
Is an RTSA more expensive?
For the same frequency range: an RTSA costs 20-50% more than a pure SSA due to the wideband ADC, FPGA, and FFT processing hardware. However: many modern analyzers include both modes (RTSA is a software option), costing $5,000-15,000 extra. For budget labs: an entry-level RTSA (Tektronix RSA306B USB, $3,500, or Siglent SSA3021X Plus, $1,200 with limited RTSA) provides basic real-time capability at low cost.
What real-time bandwidth do I need?
40 MHz: sufficient for monitoring single channels (Wi-Fi 20/40 MHz, LTE 20 MHz). 160-320 MHz: needed for Wi-Fi 6/7 (160-320 MHz channels) and 5G FR1 (100 MHz). 500-800 MHz: for 5G FR2 signal capture and wideband interference monitoring. For ISM band monitoring (2.4 GHz, 83.5 MHz span): 100+ MHz real-time BW captures the entire band simultaneously.
Can I do EMC testing with an RTSA?
Yes. RTSA with quasi-peak detector can perform EMC pre-compliance. The RTSA advantage for EMC: captures transient emissions (e.g., from a motor controller or switching power supply) that a swept analyzer might miss due to timing. However: formal EMC certification (CISPR 16) historically required a swept receiver with specific detector response times. Modern RTSA instruments (Keysight MXE, R&S ESW) with EMI receiver mode meet CISPR 16 requirements.