How do I select a signal generator for testing a receiver at millimeter wave frequencies?
mmWave Signal Generator Selection
Testing at mmWave frequencies adds significant complexity and cost compared to sub-6 GHz testing, primarily due to the higher cable losses, connector challenges, and phase noise requirements.
OTA (Over-the-Air) Testing at mmWave
(1) Many mmWave devices (5G FR2 phones, phased-array modules) have integrated antennas with no RF test port. Testing must be done OTA in an anechoic chamber or compact antenna test range (CATR). The signal generator feeds a calibrated antenna inside the chamber. The AUT (Antenna Under Test) receives the signal in free space. The path loss between the source antenna and the AUT must be calibrated. (2) OTA test systems: Keysight UXM 5G Test Platform with mmWave remote radio heads. R&S CMX500 with CATR chamber. ETS-Lindgren/MVG anechoic chambers with integrated source/receiver. OTA test system cost: $200,000-1,000,000 (including chamber, positioner, instruments).
Phase noise at 28 GHz: < -95 dBc/Hz @ 10 kHz
EVM floor: < 1.0% for 256QAM testing
Cable loss at 28 GHz: 2-5 dB/m
Price: $50K-200K (direct to 44-67 GHz)
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use a sub-6 GHz generator with an upconverter?
Yes. A common lower-cost approach: use a mid-range VSG (6-20 GHz) with an external frequency upconverter (mixer + LO) to reach mmWave. Advantages: lower instrument cost ($30,000-60,000 total). Disadvantages: higher EVM floor (the upconverter adds phase noise and distortion), additional complexity (two instruments), and limited output power. For R&D prototyping: this is a viable approach. For production or conformance testing: a direct mmWave VSG is preferred.
What about 77 GHz automotive radar testing?
Automotive radar at 77 GHz requires: a signal generator at 76-81 GHz (W-band). Options: VDI or OML frequency extenders driven by a 20-40 GHz generator, or dedicated automotive radar signal emulators (Keysight E8740A, R&S AREG100A). The radar test also requires: FMCW chirp generation (specific to automotive radar), target simulation (delay, Doppler shift, RCS), and antenna pattern characterization (OTA in anechoic chamber).
How important is phase noise at mmWave?
Phase noise is often the limiting factor for EVM at mmWave. At 28 GHz: the generator phase noise is approximately 9 dB worse than at 10 GHz (20 log(28/10)). For 5G NR 256QAM: the required EVM is 3.5%. The phase noise contribution to EVM must be < 1% to leave margin for other impairments. This requires integrated phase noise < 1° RMS (100 kHz to carrier/2). Only high-end generators achieve this at 28+ GHz. For 64QAM testing (EVM 8%): the phase noise requirement is 6 dB more relaxed, and mid-range instruments suffice.