How do I select a vector network analyzer for measurements up to 110 GHz?
VNA Selection for mmWave
Selecting a VNA for measurements up to 110 GHz is a major capital decision, as the instrument and accessories can exceed $500,000 for a complete mmWave measurement setup.
- Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
- Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
- Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
- Interface compatibility: verify impedance, connector type, and mechanical form factor match the system architecture
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a VNA to 110 GHz?
Only if your work involves: automotive radar at 77 GHz (W-band), 6G research (D-band, 110-170 GHz), or semiconductor device characterization at mmWave. For most commercial RF work: a VNA to 26.5 or 50 GHz is sufficient (covers cellular, Wi-Fi, satellite up to Ku-band). For 5G FR2: a VNA to 50-67 GHz covers the current FR2 bands. The 110 GHz capability is primarily for research, defense, and automotive radar applications.
What connector should I use?
SMA (DC-18 GHz): most common, lowest cost. 3.5 mm (DC-34 GHz): SMA-compatible, higher precision. 2.92 mm/K (DC-40 GHz): for 5G FR2 work. 2.4 mm (DC-50 GHz): for V-band measurements. 1.85 mm/V (DC-67 GHz): for full V-band. 1.0 mm (DC-110 GHz): for W-band. Use the connector that matches your frequency range. Never use a lower-rated connector above its specification (mechanical and electrical damage).
What is the difference between PNA and ENA?
Keysight PNA (Performance Network Analyzer): highest performance, for R&D and advanced measurements. Features: noise figure, active device, pulsed measurements. Keysight ENA (Entry Network Analyzer): lower cost, for component testing and production. Adequate dynamic range for most passive components. The PNA is preferred for: amplifier characterization (NF, compression, IMD), on-wafer measurements, and mmWave work. The ENA is preferred for: filter testing, cable measurements, production environments, and budget-conscious labs.