What is the Angelov model for a GaN HEMT and when is it appropriate to use?
Angelov GaN HEMT Model
The Angelov model has evolved through multiple versions since its introduction in 1992, with each version adding capabilities for GaN-specific effects.
Frequently Asked Questions
Angelov vs Curtice: which should I use?
Angelov is preferred for: GaN HEMTs (the dispersion and thermal models are essential for GaN). GaAs pHEMT PA design (the charge model and harmonic prediction are superior). Any design requiring accurate harmonic simulation (mixers, frequency multipliers, PA intermodulation). Curtice is acceptable for: simple GaAs MESFET small-signal amplifier design. Quick estimates where high accuracy is not needed. Legacy designs where Curtice models already exist and have been validated. In modern practice: virtually all new HEMT models are Angelov-based. Curtice is rarely used for new designs.
Can I get the Angelov model from the foundry?
Yes. Most III-V foundries provide Angelov models as part of their PDK (Process Design Kit). The model is extracted from test structures on the process characterization wafer. It represents the typical device performance across the wafer and across wafer lots. The model may include: corner models (fast/slow/typical) for yield estimation, temperature-dependent parameters (for simulation at different operating temperatures), and scalable models (different gate widths and number of fingers). If the foundry does not provide an Angelov model: you must extract it yourself from measured data on your specific device (following the extraction flow described above). Some foundries provide raw measured data (I-V, S-parameters) and extraction scripts.
How accurate is the Angelov model for harmonic simulation?
For PA design at the fundamental frequency: gain: ±0.5-1 dB accuracy. P_sat: ±0.5-1 dB. PAE: ±2-5% (typical). These are adequate for most practical designs. For harmonic simulation: second harmonic (2f0): ±3-5 dB accuracy (the harmonic level depends sensitively on the I-V curvature and the charge nonlinearity). Third harmonic (3f0): ±5-8 dB accuracy (even more sensitive). Intermodulation (IM3, IM5): ±3-6 dB accuracy. The harmonic accuracy improves if: the model is extracted from pulsed (not DC) I-V data (captures the RF behavior), the charge model is accurately fitted to capacitance vs bias data, and the model is verified against measured harmonic load-pull data. For critical applications (high-linearity PA for 5G base stations): measure the actual device harmonics and calibrate the model to match.