Electromagnetic Theory and Simulation Computational Electromagnetics Informational

What is the co-simulation workflow between a circuit simulator and an electromagnetic solver?

Co-simulation combines the accuracy of 3D electromagnetic simulation for passive structures with the speed and nonlinear modeling capability of circuit simulation for active devices. The workflow: (1) Partition the design: identify which parts need EM simulation (custom passive structures: filters, couplers, transitions, matching networks, interconnects) and which use circuit models (active devices, standard lumped components with manufacturer models). (2) EM simulation: simulate each passive structure in the 3D EM solver (HFSS, CST, Momentum), extracting S-parameters or equivalent circuit models. Ensure port definitions match the circuit connectivity (port impedance, reference planes, number of ports). (3) Import to circuit simulator: bring the EM-simulated S-parameter data into the circuit simulator (ADS, Microwave Office) as an N-port S-parameter block. Connect the S-parameter block to the active device models and other circuit elements. (4) Circuit simulation: run the combined circuit using the desired analysis type (linear S-parameter, harmonic balance, transient). The S-parameter block from the EM simulation is treated as a passive sub-network with frequency-dependent behavior. (5) Optimize: if the combined circuit performance needs improvement, adjust the EM geometry, re-simulate, and re-import. Modern tools support automated co-simulation where the EM solver is called from within the circuit simulator during optimization, enabling geometry parameters to be included in the optimization variable set. Keysight ADS + Momentum and AWR + AXIEM both support this automated workflow. Full 3D co-simulation (ADS + HFSS) is available through the FEM Element in ADS, which launches HFSS simulations on-demand during circuit optimization.
Category: Electromagnetic Theory and Simulation
Updated: April 2026
Product Tie-In: Simulation Software, PCB Materials

EM-Circuit Co-Simulation

Co-simulation is the standard professional workflow for RF design above 3 GHz, where the parasitic behavior of passive structures becomes significant and cannot be captured by simple circuit models. Below 3 GHz, circuit simulation alone may suffice for designs using standard components on well-characterized substrates.

  • Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
  • Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
  • Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
  • Interface compatibility: verify impedance, connector type, and mechanical form factor match the system architecture
  • Margin allocation: include sufficient design margin to account for manufacturing tolerances and aging effects
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

When is co-simulation necessary vs circuit-only?

Co-simulation is necessary when: (1) Operating above 6 GHz (parasitic effects dominate). (2) Designing custom passive structures on PCB or MMIC (filters, couplers, transitions). (3) Via transitions between layers. (4) Connector interfaces. (5) Understanding coupling between adjacent structures. Circuit-only is adequate when: (1) All passive structures are standard (vendor-characterized components with S-parameter files). (2) Operating below 3 GHz with standard RF layout practices. (3) The system has large design margin (>3 dB) that absorbs modeling errors. Between 3-6 GHz: co-simulation is recommended for precision designs but may be optional if the design uses well-characterized components and established layout practices.

How long does a co-simulation optimization take?

Depends on the EM complexity: Simple planar structure (single-layer microstrip matching network, 5 optimization variables): Momentum 2.5D solve: 30-60 seconds per iteration. 100 iterations: 1-2 hours. Complex 3D structure (via transition, multi-layer, 8 optimization variables): HFSS 3D solve: 5-30 minutes per iteration. 50 iterations: 4-25 hours. Strategies to reduce time: (1) Use 2.5D (Momentum, AXIEM) instead of 3D when possible (10-50× faster). (2) Use surrogate models: run 50-100 EM simulations at strategic parameter combinations, fit a response surface model, then optimize on the fast surrogate. (3) Reduce the optimization variable count by using analytical pre-optimization. (4) Use gradient-based optimization (fewer iterations than genetic algorithms) when the response surface is smooth.

Can I co-simulate with different vendor tools?

Yes, using file-based co-simulation: (1) Run the EM simulation in any tool (HFSS, CST, COMSOL). (2) Export S-parameters in Touchstone format. (3) Import into any circuit simulator (ADS, Microwave Office, Cadence Spectre RF). This is the universal approach. For integrated co-simulation: vendor pairing matters: ADS + Momentum (both Keysight): seamless integrated co-simulation. ADS + HFSS (Keysight + Ansys): supported through the FEM Element in ADS. Microwave Office + AXIEM (both Cadence/AWR): seamless. Microwave Office + Analyst (both Cadence): 3D FEM integration. CST + other circuit simulators: file-based or Simulia CST-ADS link. Cross-vendor integrated co-simulation is possible but may have workflow friction compared to same-vendor solutions.

Need expert RF components?

Request a Quote

RF Essentials supplies precision components for noise-critical, high-linearity, and impedance-matched systems.

Get in Touch