What is the radial power combiner and when would I use it at millimeter wave frequencies?
Radial Power Combiner at mmW
The radial combiner was developed to overcome the combiner loss problem at high frequencies. At mmW: every 0.1 dB of combiner loss is significant because generating power is difficult and expensive.
| Parameter | Class A | Class AB | Class F/Doherty |
|---|---|---|---|
| Max Efficiency | 50% | 50-78% | 70-90% |
| Linearity | Excellent | Good | Moderate (needs DPD) |
| P1dB Backoff | 0-3 dB | 3-6 dB | 6-10 dB |
| Complexity | Low | Low | High |
| Common Use | Test, small signal | General PA | Base station, broadcast |
- Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
- Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
- Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
- Interface compatibility: verify impedance, connector type, and mechanical form factor match the system architecture
Frequently Asked Questions
Who manufactures radial combiners?
Commercial radial combiner manufacturers: Microwave Solutions Inc. (MSI): standard and custom radial combiners to 40 GHz. Spatial Corporation: integrated spatial/radial combiners for mmW. Custom designs: many military and aerospace companies design radial combiners in-house for specific programs. At research level: university groups have demonstrated radial combiners at 94 GHz, 140 GHz, and 220 GHz for THz power combining.
What is the bandwidth?
Radial combiners are inherently wideband because: the radial waveguide mode is non-dispersive (TEM mode), and the probe design can be broadband (use a ridged or tapered probe). Typical bandwidth: 2:1 to 4:1 (an octave to two octaves) for well-designed radial combiners. At mmW: the bandwidth may be limited by the probe-to-waveguide transition (which becomes narrowband for small probes). A typical Ka-band radial combiner: 26-40 GHz (42% bandwidth) with 0.3 dB combining loss.
How does it compare to spatial combining?
Spatial (quasi-optical) combining: the PAs radiate into free space and the outputs combine in the propagation medium. Advantages: zero combiner structure loss (no metallic walls or transmission lines), scales to very large N (100+ devices demonstrated). Disadvantages: requires a re-focusing structure (lens or reflector) to capture the combined power, is physically larger, and is more complex to align. Radial combiner: more compact and self-contained. Better suited for: packaged commercial products and systems where a single coaxial output is needed. Spatial combiner: better for: highest N (100+) and highest frequency (above 100 GHz) where even the radial combiner's losses become significant.