What is the interference mitigation strategy for automotive radar when many vehicles have radar?
Automotive Radar Interference Mitigation
Automotive radar interference is becoming a significant engineering challenge as radar deployment grows. Current estimates project 1-2 billion automotive radar sensors by 2030, creating a dense RF environment on highways and in urban areas.
- Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
- Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
- Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
Frequently Asked Questions
How effective is chirp randomization?
Chirp randomization is the simplest and most widely deployed mitigation. By randomizing the chirp start time (within a 10-100 us window): the interference from another radar's chirp is distributed across many range bins rather than concentrated in one, reducing the peak interference by 10-20 dB. By randomizing the chirp slope: the beat frequency from interference changes every chirp, spreading the interference across Doppler bins. Combined: randomization reduces the peak interference by 20-30 dB, which is sufficient for moderate density scenarios (10-50 interferers). In very dense scenarios: additional mitigation (excision, PMCW) is needed.
How does PMCW help with interference?
PMCW (phase-modulated continuous wave) radar uses pseudo-random binary phase codes instead of frequency chirps. The receiver correlates the received signal with its own code, providing processing gain against any signal that doesn't match the code. Against interference from another PMCW radar with a different code: the processing gain (20-40 dB, depending on the code length) suppresses the interference. Against FMCW interference: the phase coding spreads the interference energy across all range bins. PMCW inherently provides better interference rejection than FMCW, which is why companies like Uhnder are developing PMCW automotive radar.
Is regulatory action needed?
Current ETSI and FCC regulations set maximum EIRP and duty cycle limits but do not mandate specific waveforms or interference mitigation techniques. As radar density increases: regulatory bodies may need to mandate: minimum interference mitigation performance, waveform coordination protocols, or spectral etiquette rules. The IEEE 802.11bd task group and ETSI TR 103 593 are studying automotive radar interference and potential regulatory frameworks. Industry consensus is moving toward: mandatory interference detection and mitigation in all automotive radar, with optional cooperative coordination.