What is the difference between a search radar and a tracking radar in terms of RF design?
RF Design Differences Between Search and Tracking Radars
Understanding the RF design trade-offs between search and track functions is essential for radar system engineers, whether designing dedicated single-function radars or multifunction arrays that must perform both roles efficiently.
- Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
- Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
- Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a single radar perform both search and track?
Yes. Modern multifunction phased array radars (like AN/SPY-1 Aegis or AN/SPY-6) rapidly switch their beam between search scan patterns and dedicated track dwells. The electronically steered beam can revisit each tracked target multiple times per second while continuing to scan the search volume.
Why do tracking radars use monopulse rather than sequential lobing?
Monopulse measures target angle on a single pulse by comparing simultaneous signals from two or four feed elements, making it immune to target amplitude fluctuations (scintillation). Sequential lobing techniques (conical scan) measure angle by comparing signals received at different times, making them vulnerable to amplitude modulation by the target or intentional jamming.
What is the typical angular accuracy of a tracking radar?
A well-designed monopulse tracking radar achieves angular accuracy of 0.1 to 1 milliradian (0.006 to 0.06 degrees) depending on SNR, beam width, and target characteristics. This corresponds to position accuracy of 0.1 to 1 meter at 1 km range.