Millimeter Wave Specific Challenges mmWave Radar and Sensing Informational

What is the difference between a pulsed radar and a continuous wave radar at millimeter wave frequencies?

Pulsed radar and continuous-wave (CW) radar are the two fundamental radar architectures, with distinct operating principles and performance tradeoffs at mmWave: (1) Pulsed radar: transmits short pulses (nanoseconds to microseconds) and listens for echoes during the silent period between pulses. Range is measured from the pulse round-trip time: R = c × t_delay / 2. The transmitter and receiver are time-multiplexed (TX is off during RX, and vice versa). This provides inherent TX-RX isolation (no self-interference during receive). Range resolution: determined by the pulse width: Δr = c × tau_pulse / 2. For a 1 ns pulse: Δr = 15 cm. For a 10 ns pulse: Δr = 1.5 m. At mmWave: generating very short pulses (< 1 ns for cm-level resolution) is challenging. Pulsed compression (chirped pulse) can improve resolution without reducing pulse width. Peak power: a pulsed radar must transmit all its energy in the short pulse duration. For the same average power: the peak power is much higher than CW. Peak power = P_avg / duty_cycle. For 10% duty cycle: peak power is 10× the average. At mmWave: achieving high peak power (> 1 W) is expensive (requires large GaN PAs). (2) Continuous-wave (CW/FMCW) radar: transmits continuously (no pulses). The transmitter and receiver operate simultaneously. Range is measured from the frequency difference between the TX and RX signals (for FMCW). TX-RX isolation is a challenge: the TX signal leaks directly into the RX (since both operate simultaneously). CW leakage: -20 to -40 dB of the TX power reaches the RX. This sets the noise floor and limits the dynamic range. At mmWave: TX-RX isolation is achieved through: separate TX and RX antennas (physical separation), circulators (limited effectiveness at mmWave due to loss and bandwidth), and signal processing (subtracting the known TX leakage from the RX signal). Power: CW radar transmits at low, constant power (typically +10 to +20 dBm total). No high peak power requirement. This makes the PA design simpler and cheaper. (3) FMCW (the dominant mmWave CW variant): combines CW operation with frequency modulation for range measurement. The frequency sweep bandwidth determines the range resolution (Δr = c/(2×BW)). A 4 GHz sweep provides 3.75 cm resolution without requiring picosecond pulse widths.
Category: Millimeter Wave Specific Challenges
Updated: April 2026
Product Tie-In: Radar ICs, Antennas, Signal Processors

Pulsed vs CW Radar

At mmWave frequencies, FMCW is the overwhelmingly dominant radar architecture for commercial and automotive applications due to its simplicity, low cost, and excellent resolution performance.

  • Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
  • Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
  • Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
  • Interface compatibility: verify impedance, connector type, and mechanical form factor match the system architecture
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is FMCW dominant at mmWave?

Three reasons: (1) Integration: the entire FMCW radar (VCO, PLL, PA, LNA, mixer, ADC, DSP) fits on a single SiGe or CMOS IC. The low TX power (< +15 dBm) allows the PA to be integrated. A pulsed radar needs a separate high-power PA and a fast T/R switch, making single-chip integration impractical. (2) Resolution from bandwidth: at mmWave, wide bandwidth is available (4-14 GHz). FMCW directly converts this bandwidth to range resolution. No need for ultrashort pulses. (3) Cost: the single-chip FMCW IC costs $5-$15 at volume. A comparable pulsed radar at 77 GHz would cost 10-100× more. For automotive and consumer markets: cost is the decisive factor.

Can FMCW radar measure velocity?

Yes. FMCW radar measures velocity through the Doppler shift observed across multiple chirps. Within a single chirp: only range is measured (from the beat frequency). Across multiple chirps: the phase of the beat signal changes proportionally to the target velocity (Δφ = 4πv·T_chirp/λ). A Doppler FFT across N chirps resolves the velocity. This is the standard "Range-Doppler" processing used in all modern FMCW radar. Velocity resolution: Δv = λ/(2·N·T_chirp). For N = 128 at T_chirp = 50 μs at 77 GHz: Δv = 0.30 m/s. Max unambiguous velocity: v_max = λ/(4·T_chirp) = 12.5 m/s (for T_chirp = 78 μs).

What about noise radar?

Noise radar transmits a random noise waveform (instead of a chirp or pulse). Range is measured by correlating the received signal with a delayed copy of the transmitted noise. Advantages: inherently low probability of intercept (LPI); the transmitted signal looks like noise. No interference with other radars (the noise is unique). Disadvantages: lower processing gain than FMCW (the correlation is less efficient than matched filtering of a deterministic chirp). More complex signal processing. Used in: military LPI radar, through-wall radar, and some research applications. At mmWave: noise radar is a niche technology. FMCW dominates due to lower cost and higher performance.

Need expert RF components?

Request a Quote

RF Essentials supplies precision components for noise-critical, high-linearity, and impedance-matched systems.

Get in Touch