What is the difference between a GEO, MEO, and LEO satellite orbit for communication purposes?
Orbit Comparison
Ground terminal complexity: GEO requires only a fixed dish (no tracking for broadcast). MEO requires slow tracking or electronically steered antennas. LEO requires fast electronic beam steering (phased array or flat-panel antenna) to track the rapidly moving satellite and perform handovers between satellites every 5-15 minutes. The proliferation of flat-panel electronically steered antennas has made LEO ground terminals practical for consumer and enterprise use.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which orbit for latency-sensitive applications?
LEO: < 20 ms round-trip (comparable to terrestrial networks). Required for: gaming, real-time control, financial trading. GEO's 480 ms round-trip makes interactive applications noticeably sluggish.
Cost comparison?
GEO satellite: $200-500M per satellite, 15-year life, 3 needed for global coverage. Total: $0.6-1.5B. LEO constellation: $1-5M per satellite, 5-7 year life, 1,000-4,000 needed. Total: $5-20B initial + ongoing replenishment. LEO's total cost is higher but provides much higher aggregate capacity (many small beams vs. few large beams).