Copper
Why Copper Dominates RF Conductor Design
Among engineering metals only silver edges out copper for conductivity, and silver costs far more and tarnishes readily, so copper became the default conductor for everything from coaxial center pins to spacecraft cavity filters. At DC and low frequencies the full cross section of a copper trace carries current, but as frequency rises the field is expelled from the interior and current crowds into a thin surface sheet. By 1 GHz that sheet is only about 2.1 micrometers thick, and by 30 GHz it shrinks below 0.4 micrometers. The practical consequence is that thick copper buys you nothing electrically at RF; what matters is the conductivity, cleanliness, and smoothness of the outermost fraction of a micrometer.
This is why copper foil for high-frequency laminate comes in distinct grades. Electrodeposited (ED) foil is plated onto a rotating drum and develops a tooth-like matte side for adhesion, giving root-mean-square roughness of several micrometers. Rolled-annealed (RA) foil is mechanically rolled to a glassy finish near 0.3 micrometers, and reverse-treated and low-profile foils target a middle ground. When the roughness profile becomes comparable to or larger than the skin depth, RF current is forced to follow the contoured surface, lengthening its path and raising the effective sheet resistance. The widely used Hammerstad correction caps this penalty near a factor of two, while the Huray "snowball" model better fits the steep millimeter-wave behavior of modern foils.
Copper conductivity is also temperature dependent, dropping about 0.39 percent per degree Celsius of temperature rise. A power amplifier output network or a high-power filter that heats to 85 C therefore sees copper conductivity drop to roughly 80 percent of its 20 C IACS rating (and near 75 percent by about 105 C), which must be folded into thermal and loss budgets. Plated copper used to metallize waveguide and connectors carries additional caveats: plating additives, grain structure, and a barrier or final finish of nickel or gold all reduce the effective conductivity below the textbook bulk value.
Skin Depth and Conductor Loss
δ = 1 / √(π × f × μ × σ)
RF Surface Resistance:
Rs = √(π × f × μ / σ) = 1 / (σ × δ) Ω/square
Roughness-Corrected Loss (Hammerstad):
KSR = 1 + (2/π) × arctan[1.4 × (Δ/δ)2], Reff = KSR × Rs
Where f = frequency, μ ≈ 4π×10-7 H/m, σ = 5.8×107 S/m, Δ = RMS roughness. Example: at 10 GHz, δ ≈ 0.66 μm and Rs ≈ 0.026 Ω/square; with Δ = 1 μm roughness, KSR ≈ 1.8.
Copper Conductor Materials and Finishes
| Material / Finish | Conductivity (% IACS) | RMS Roughness | Typical Use | RF Note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silver | 105% | Plating dependent | Cavity walls, high-Q filters | Lowest loss; tarnishes |
| Copper (annealed, IACS ref) | 100% | Bulk reference | Baseline conductor | Best cost vs. loss |
| Rolled-annealed (RA) foil | 97 to 100% | 0.3 to 0.7 μm | mmWave laminate cladding | Lowest foil loss |
| Electrodeposited (ED) foil | 95 to 100% | 2 to 6 μm | Standard PCB cladding | High loss above 20 GHz |
| Copper + ENIG (Ni/Au) | Ni-P ~3 to 5% | Finish dependent | Solderable RF pads | Resistive Ni-P adds skin loss |
| Aluminum (for reference) | 61% | Machining dependent | Lightweight housings | ~30% more loss than Cu |
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the skin depth of copper at common RF frequencies?
Skin depth scales as 1/√f. With σ = 5.8×107 S/m, copper skin depth is about 66 μm at 1 MHz, 2.1 μm at 1 GHz, 0.66 μm at 10 GHz, 0.38 μm at 30 GHz, and roughly 0.30 μm at 50 GHz. RF current rides in this thin layer, so only the surface copper and its finish carry meaningful current. Above 20 to 30 GHz the skin depth drops below typical foil roughness, which is exactly why surface profile dominates loss at millimeter wave.
Why does electrodeposited copper have higher loss than rolled-annealed copper at mmWave?
ED foil is grown on a drum with a rough matte side, commonly 2 to 6 μm RMS, while RA foil is rolled to about 0.3 to 0.7 μm. Since current concentrates within one skin depth (0.66 μm at 10 GHz, 0.38 μm at 30 GHz), a rough profile lengthens the current path and raises effective resistance, with the Hammerstad model capping the penalty near 2x. At 28 GHz the gap between rough ED and smooth low-profile foil can reach 0.3 to 0.5 dB/inch on microstrip.
What copper conductivity should I use for RF simulation?
The 100% IACS reference is 5.80×107 S/m for annealed copper at 20 °C. Solvers often default to that, but real plated or foil copper is better modeled at 4.7 to 5.6×107 S/m (80 to 97% IACS) to account for grain boundaries, oxidation, and plating additives. Conductivity falls about 0.39% per °C, so copper at 85 °C is near 80% IACS (and about 75% by 105 °C). Pair a realistic σ with a Hammerstad or Huray roughness model for trustworthy insertion-loss predictions.