Materials & Substrates

Copper

/KOP-er/ (Cu, atomic number 29)
The workhorse conductor of RF and microwave hardware, with a bulk conductivity of 5.8×107 S/m (the 100% IACS reference) that is second only to silver. Because RF current obeys the skin effect and rides in a layer just a few micrometers deep, the copper surface, not its bulk, determines conductor loss. As copper foil cladding on PCB laminate, electroplated waveguide walls, and machined resonator cavities, its conductivity, plating quality, and surface roughness set the insertion loss and unloaded Q of nearly every passive RF structure from HF through millimeter-wave bands.
Conductivity: 5.8×107 S/m (100% IACS)
Skin Depth @ 10 GHz: ≈ 0.66 μm
Temp Coefficient: +0.39% / °C resistivity

Why Copper Dominates RF Conductor Design

Among engineering metals only silver edges out copper for conductivity, and silver costs far more and tarnishes readily, so copper became the default conductor for everything from coaxial center pins to spacecraft cavity filters. At DC and low frequencies the full cross section of a copper trace carries current, but as frequency rises the field is expelled from the interior and current crowds into a thin surface sheet. By 1 GHz that sheet is only about 2.1 micrometers thick, and by 30 GHz it shrinks below 0.4 micrometers. The practical consequence is that thick copper buys you nothing electrically at RF; what matters is the conductivity, cleanliness, and smoothness of the outermost fraction of a micrometer.

This is why copper foil for high-frequency laminate comes in distinct grades. Electrodeposited (ED) foil is plated onto a rotating drum and develops a tooth-like matte side for adhesion, giving root-mean-square roughness of several micrometers. Rolled-annealed (RA) foil is mechanically rolled to a glassy finish near 0.3 micrometers, and reverse-treated and low-profile foils target a middle ground. When the roughness profile becomes comparable to or larger than the skin depth, RF current is forced to follow the contoured surface, lengthening its path and raising the effective sheet resistance. The widely used Hammerstad correction caps this penalty near a factor of two, while the Huray "snowball" model better fits the steep millimeter-wave behavior of modern foils.

Copper conductivity is also temperature dependent, dropping about 0.39 percent per degree Celsius of temperature rise. A power amplifier output network or a high-power filter that heats to 85 C therefore sees copper conductivity drop to roughly 80 percent of its 20 C IACS rating (and near 75 percent by about 105 C), which must be folded into thermal and loss budgets. Plated copper used to metallize waveguide and connectors carries additional caveats: plating additives, grain structure, and a barrier or final finish of nickel or gold all reduce the effective conductivity below the textbook bulk value.

Skin Depth and Conductor Loss

Skin Depth:
δ = 1 / √(π × f × μ × σ)

RF Surface Resistance:
Rs = √(π × f × μ / σ) = 1 / (σ × δ)  Ω/square

Roughness-Corrected Loss (Hammerstad):
KSR = 1 + (2/π) × arctan[1.4 × (Δ/δ)2],  Reff = KSR × Rs

Where f = frequency, μ ≈ 4π×10-7 H/m, σ = 5.8×107 S/m, Δ = RMS roughness. Example: at 10 GHz, δ ≈ 0.66 μm and Rs ≈ 0.026 Ω/square; with Δ = 1 μm roughness, KSR ≈ 1.8.

Copper Conductor Materials and Finishes

Material / FinishConductivity (% IACS)RMS RoughnessTypical UseRF Note
Silver105%Plating dependentCavity walls, high-Q filtersLowest loss; tarnishes
Copper (annealed, IACS ref)100%Bulk referenceBaseline conductorBest cost vs. loss
Rolled-annealed (RA) foil97 to 100%0.3 to 0.7 μmmmWave laminate claddingLowest foil loss
Electrodeposited (ED) foil95 to 100%2 to 6 μmStandard PCB claddingHigh loss above 20 GHz
Copper + ENIG (Ni/Au)Ni-P ~3 to 5%Finish dependentSolderable RF padsResistive Ni-P adds skin loss
Aluminum (for reference)61%Machining dependentLightweight housings~30% more loss than Cu
Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the skin depth of copper at common RF frequencies?

Skin depth scales as 1/√f. With σ = 5.8×107 S/m, copper skin depth is about 66 μm at 1 MHz, 2.1 μm at 1 GHz, 0.66 μm at 10 GHz, 0.38 μm at 30 GHz, and roughly 0.30 μm at 50 GHz. RF current rides in this thin layer, so only the surface copper and its finish carry meaningful current. Above 20 to 30 GHz the skin depth drops below typical foil roughness, which is exactly why surface profile dominates loss at millimeter wave.

Why does electrodeposited copper have higher loss than rolled-annealed copper at mmWave?

ED foil is grown on a drum with a rough matte side, commonly 2 to 6 μm RMS, while RA foil is rolled to about 0.3 to 0.7 μm. Since current concentrates within one skin depth (0.66 μm at 10 GHz, 0.38 μm at 30 GHz), a rough profile lengthens the current path and raises effective resistance, with the Hammerstad model capping the penalty near 2x. At 28 GHz the gap between rough ED and smooth low-profile foil can reach 0.3 to 0.5 dB/inch on microstrip.

What copper conductivity should I use for RF simulation?

The 100% IACS reference is 5.80×107 S/m for annealed copper at 20 °C. Solvers often default to that, but real plated or foil copper is better modeled at 4.7 to 5.6×107 S/m (80 to 97% IACS) to account for grain boundaries, oxidation, and plating additives. Conductivity falls about 0.39% per °C, so copper at 85 °C is near 80% IACS (and about 75% by 105 °C). Pair a realistic σ with a Hammerstad or Huray roughness model for trustworthy insertion-loss predictions.

Materials & Substrates

Low-Loss mmWave Hardware

Need millimeter-wave components built on low-profile copper cladding and precision-plated waveguide for minimal insertion loss? Talk to our engineering team about your design.

Get in Touch