Continuous Class-F
The Continuous-Mode Solution Space
Conventional Class-F operation rests on one rigid recipe: terminate every even harmonic in a short and every odd harmonic in an open. The resulting flattened voltage waveform and half-sinusoidal current barely overlap, which is why the ideal mode reaches 90.7% efficiency when only the third harmonic is controlled (the maximally flat two-harmonic voltage solution) and approaches 100% as more odd harmonics are added. The problem is that those impedance conditions are single points at a single frequency, and no physical matching network can hold an exact short and an exact open across more than a sliver of bandwidth. Continuous Class-F, introduced by Carrubba, Cripps, and colleagues, dissolves that constraint by recognizing that the Class-F voltage waveform can be multiplied by a reactive shaping factor without raising any negative voltage excursion.
The shaping factor is (1 − γ sinθ), where θ is the normalized phase of the fundamental drive and γ is the continuous design parameter. At γ = 0 the waveform collapses to the textbook maximally flat Class-F drain voltage (a true square wave only in the limit of infinite odd harmonics). As γ sweeps from −1 to +1, the fundamental load picks up a reactive part and the second-harmonic termination moves off the short into a controlled reactance, while the third harmonic stays near an open. Each γ is a complete, fully efficient amplifier in its own right, so the designer is no longer hitting three points but riding a continuous locus of targets.
Because impedance naturally rotates with frequency through the package, bond wires, and output capacitance of a GaN HEMT, a continuous Class-F network can be engineered so the presented impedance lands on a different but equally valid γ at each frequency in the band. That is the mechanism behind reported designs spanning roughly 1.5 to 2.7 GHz at better than 70% efficiency, performance that is verified on the bench with load-pull characterization to confirm the harmonic arcs.
Governing Waveform Relations
vDS(θ) = (1 − α cosθ + β cos3θ)(1 − γ sinθ)
Optimum harmonic terminations vs. γ:
Z1 ≈ Ropt(1 + jγ) (fundamental, reactive arc ∝ γ)
X2 ∝ γ · Ropt (2nd harmonic, pure reactance, sign tracks γ)
Z3 → ∞ (3rd harmonic, open)
Ideal drain efficiency (3rd-harmonic peaking):
ηmax = π√3/6 ≈ 90.7% (ideal, γ-independent) → lower with finite knee
Where α ≈ 2/√3 and β ≈ 1/(3√3) set the maximally flat voltage, Ropt ≈ (4/√3)(VDD − Vknee)/Imax for the maximally flat case, and γ spans −1 to +1. Each γ holds the same η while shifting Z1 and X2.
Mode Comparison for High-Efficiency PAs
| Mode | Ideal Drain Eff. | 2nd Harmonic | 3rd Harmonic | Typical Frac. BW | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous Class-F | 90.7% (3rd) | Reactive arc (∝γ) | Open | 40 to 60% | Broadband, design locus |
| Class-F | 90.7% (3rd) | Short | Open | 2 to 8% | Narrowband, fixed points |
| Inverse Class-F | 90.7% (3rd) | Open | Short | 2 to 8% | Swaps current/voltage shaping |
| Class-J | ~78.5% | Reactive (∝β) | Soft | 30 to 50% | Wideband, no 3rd-harmonic open |
| Class-E | ~85 to 90% | Capacitive | Switch-defined | 5 to 15% | Switch-mode, high peak voltage |
Frequently Asked Questions
How does continuous Class-F differ from standard Class-F?
Standard Class-F fixes a short at every even harmonic and an open at every odd harmonic, giving one impedance target and 90.7% ideal efficiency with third-harmonic control. Continuous Class-F multiplies the voltage waveform by a (1 − γ sinθ) reactive factor, with γ swept from −1 to +1. Every γ is fully efficient, so the fundamental and second-harmonic targets become arcs on the Smith chart instead of points, and a matching network can satisfy the condition over a 40 to 60% band.
What harmonic impedances does a continuous Class-F design require?
The fundamental presents Ropt plus a γ-dependent reactance, sweeping an arc around the resistive Class-F point. The second harmonic is a controlled reactance X2 ∝ γ rather than a hard short. The third harmonic is held near an open to flatten the voltage. Designers typically control the first three harmonics and let the fourth and higher settle where the device output capacitance places them; allowing a non-zero second-harmonic reactance is what opens the band.
Why does continuous Class-F give wider bandwidth than Class-F?
Fixed Class-F must hit an exact resistive fundamental, a second-harmonic short, and a third-harmonic open at one frequency, which a real network and the device capacitance cannot hold across frequency. Continuous Class-F replaces each point with a locus, so as the network rotates impedance with frequency the design lands on a different valid γ. GaN HEMT realizations report 1.5 to 2.7 GHz coverage at 70 to 75% drain efficiency and 10 to 13 W.