Commissioning
Understanding Commissioning
Commissioning bridges the gap between physical installation and live network operation. A newly installed base station may be physically complete, with antennas mounted, cables routed, and equipment powered, but without commissioning there is no assurance that it will perform as designed. Common issues discovered during commissioning include swapped antenna port connections (e.g., TX connected to RX port), incorrect downtilt settings (which dramatically affect coverage area and interference to neighbors), PIM from improperly torqued connectors, excessive cable loss from damaged feedlines, and software configuration errors.
The commissioning sequence follows a logical bottom-up approach. First, the passive antenna system is verified: cable loss and VSWR are measured from the equipment room to the antenna port using a portable cable and antenna analyzer. PIM is tested by injecting two high-power carriers and measuring intermodulation products at the receive frequency. Then the active equipment is powered up: transmitter output power is measured at the antenna port (not just at the radio output) to confirm the entire path loss matches the link budget. Receiver sensitivity is verified against 3GPP reference sensitivity requirements. Finally, coverage is validated through drive testing, comparing measured RSRP, RSRQ, and SINR against the RF planning predictions.
Commissioning Test Specifications
Pant = Ptx − Ljumper − Lfeeder − Lconnector dBm
Target: within ±1 dB of design
VSWR Acceptance:
VSWR < 1.5:1 (→ RL > 14 dB) across operating band
PIM Acceptance:
IM3 < −150 dBc at 2 × 20 W carriers
Total path loss verification: design says 3.2 dB, measured 3.5 dB = acceptable (±1 dB). Measured 6.8 dB = failure, investigate damaged cable or connector. VSWR > 2:1 at any frequency in-band = fail, typically indicates water ingress, damaged connector, or open/short in the feedline.
Commissioning Phase Checklist
| Phase | Tests | Equipment | Pass Criteria | Common Failures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Passive system | VSWR, loss, PIM | Cable analyzer, PIM tester | VSWR < 1.5:1, PIM < −150 dBc | Water ingress, bad torque |
| Transmitter | Power, spectrum, EVM | Power meter, spectrum analyzer | ±1 dB of design, EVM < spec | PA fault, wrong config |
| Receiver | Sensitivity, NF | Signal generator, BER tester | REFSENS per 3GPP | Swapped ports, LNA failure |
| Coverage | Drive test, RSRP/SINR | Drive test tool, GPS | > 95% area above −105 dBm | Wrong downtilt, overshooting |
| Integration | Handover, alarms, sync | Network management, UE | 100% alarm propagation | Neighbor list errors |
Frequently Asked Questions
What tests are performed during RF commissioning?
A structured sequence: antenna VSWR/return loss sweeps (<1.5:1), PIM testing at rated power, azimuth/downtilt verification, transmitter output power at the antenna port (±1 dB of design), spectral mask and EVM compliance, receiver sensitivity per 3GPP, drive-test coverage mapping, neighbor list and handover testing, alarm propagation, and GPS/timing sync.
What is the difference between commissioning and acceptance testing?
Commissioning is the engineering process: powering up, configuring, aligning, calibrating, and troubleshooting. Acceptance is the contractual milestone: the customer witnesses specific tests against defined KPIs and formally signs off, triggering payment. Commissioning precedes acceptance and may involve iterative fixes; acceptance is a single pass/fail event.
What documentation is produced during commissioning?
As-built drawings, VSWR sweep plots for all ports/bands, PIM test results, power measurements, receiver sensitivity data, drive-test coverage maps (RSRP/RSRQ/SINR), antenna photos with GPS coordinates, cable records, alarm test results, and the final SAT report comparing all values against contractual KPIs.