EMI, EMC, and Shielding Advanced EMC Topics Informational

What is the effect of cable shield termination technique on the shielding effectiveness at high frequencies?

The cable shield termination technique has a dramatic effect on the shielding effectiveness at high frequencies because the manner in which the cable shield connects to the equipment enclosure determines whether the shield current flows through a low-impedance path (maintaining SE) or through a high-impedance pigtail that acts as an antenna (radiating the noise). The key termination methods are: 360-degree (circumferential) termination (the cable shield connects to the enclosure through a full 360-degree contact with the connector backshell or a conductive gland; this provides the lowest impedance path and highest SE: > 40-60 dB up to several GHz; this is the recommended method for all applications above 10 MHz), pigtail termination (the cable shield is stripped back and a short wire connects the shield braid to a ground point on the enclosure; the pigtail wire has inductance, approximately 10 nH/cm, which creates a high impedance at high frequencies: a 5 cm pigtail has approximately 50 nH, which is 300 ohms at 1 GHz; SE is degraded by 20-40 dB above 100 MHz compared to 360-degree termination; pigtail terminations should never be used above 10 MHz), and drain wire termination (a drain wire sewn into the shielded cable is connected to a PCB ground pad; similar degradation to pigtail; acceptable only below 1 MHz). The SE degradation from a pigtail termination is approximately: delta_SE = 20 log(1 + j omega L_pigtail / Z_transfer), where L_pigtail is the pigtail inductance and Z_transfer is the cable's transfer impedance.
Category: EMI, EMC, and Shielding
Updated: April 2026
Product Tie-In: Shielding, Gaskets, Absorbers, Filters

Cable Shield Termination for High-Frequency Performance

Cable shield termination is one of the most common errors in EMC design. A perfectly shielded cable can lose 30-40 dB of shielding effectiveness from a single pigtail termination. Understanding and implementing proper shield terminations is essential for meeting radiated emission limits.

ParameterOption AOption BOption C
PerformanceHighMediumLow
CostHighLowMedium
ComplexityHighLowMedium
BandwidthNarrowWideModerate
Typical UseLab/militaryConsumerIndustrial

Technical Considerations

When evaluating the effect of cable shield termination technique on the shielding effectiveness at high frequencies?, engineers must account for the specific requirements of their target application. The optimal choice depends on the frequency range, power level, environmental conditions, and cost constraints of the overall system design.

Performance Analysis

When evaluating the effect of cable shield termination technique on the shielding effectiveness at high frequencies?, engineers must account for the specific requirements of their target application. The optimal choice depends on the frequency range, power level, environmental conditions, and cost constraints of the overall system design.

Design Guidelines

When evaluating the effect of cable shield termination technique on the shielding effectiveness at high frequencies?, engineers must account for the specific requirements of their target application. The optimal choice depends on the frequency range, power level, environmental conditions, and cost constraints of the overall system design.

  • Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
  • Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
  • Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
  • Interface compatibility: verify impedance, connector type, and mechanical form factor match the system architecture
  • Margin allocation: include sufficient design margin to account for manufacturing tolerances and aging effects

Implementation Notes

When evaluating the effect of cable shield termination technique on the shielding effectiveness at high frequencies?, engineers must account for the specific requirements of their target application. The optimal choice depends on the frequency range, power level, environmental conditions, and cost constraints of the overall system design.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use a pigtail if it is very short?

A shorter pigtail is better than a longer one, but even a 1 cm pigtail has approximately 10 nH of inductance, which is 6 ohms at 100 MHz and 63 ohms at 1 GHz. This still degrades SE by 10-20 dB at GHz frequencies compared to a 360-degree termination. For frequencies above 100 MHz: any pigtail is too long. For frequencies below 10 MHz: a 1-2 cm pigtail is acceptable because the inductance is negligible at low frequencies.

How do I terminate a shielded cable to a PCB?

Best methods: use a shielded connector that makes 360-degree contact with the PCB ground plane (e.g., a shielded RJ-45, USB, or HDMI connector where the shell contacts the PCB ground pads around the entire connector footprint). Second best: use a metal cable clamp that presses the cable shield braid against a large ground pad on the PCB near the connector. Worst: solder a pigtail wire from the braid to a single ground pad.

Does double shielding help if the termination is poor?

No. A double-shielded cable with pigtail terminations performs no better than a single-shielded cable with pigtail terminations, because the leakage path is at the termination, not through the cable shield braid. The pigtail inductance bypasses both shield layers equally. Double shielding only helps when both shield layers are properly terminated with 360-degree connections.

Need expert RF components?

Request a Quote

RF Essentials supplies precision components for noise-critical, high-linearity, and impedance-matched systems.

Get in Touch