Measurements, Testing, and Calibration Noise and Specialized Measurements Informational

How do I measure the phase noise of an oscillator using a cross-correlation technique?

The cross-correlation technique measures oscillator phase noise by using two independent reference channels and correlating their outputs. The correlated components (the DUT phase noise) accumulate while the uncorrelated components (the reference channel noise) average toward zero, providing a measurement floor below the noise of either reference channel individually. Setup: (1) The oscillator under test (DUT) is split into two paths using a power divider. (2) Each path feeds a separate downconverter (mixer + independent reference oscillator). The two reference oscillators must be independent (uncorrelated phase noise). (3) Each downconverter output is digitized by an ADC. (4) The digital processor computes the cross-spectral density: S_xy(f) = conj(X(f)) × Y(f), where X(f) and Y(f) are the FFTs of the two channels. (5) The phase noise of the DUT = average of |S_xy(f)| over N measurements. (6) Processing gain: the measurement floor improves by 5×log10(N_correlations). For N = 100: 10 dB improvement. N = 10,000: 20 dB. N = 1,000,000: 30 dB improvement below the single-channel noise floor. This allows measurement of ultra-low phase noise oscillators (e.g., -180 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset from a sapphire oscillator) that are far below the noise floor of any individual measurement channel. Commercial instruments: Keysight E5052B (cross-correlation SSA), Rohde & Schwarz FSWP (built-in cross-correlation), Microsemi 5125A (dedicated phase noise test set). These instruments contain two independent measurement channels and perform the cross-correlation processing automatically.
Category: Measurements, Testing, and Calibration
Updated: April 2026
Product Tie-In: Noise Sources, Analyzers, Calibration Standards

Cross-Correlation Phase Noise Measurement

Cross-correlation is the gold standard for measuring ultra-low phase noise sources because it overcomes the fundamental limitation that the measurement system noise floor must be below the DUT phase noise.

ParameterSOLT CalTRL CaleCal
AccuracyGoodExcellentGood-very good
Standards Needed4 (S,O,L,T)3 (T,R,L)1 (module)
BandwidthBroadbandBand-limitedBroadband
Setup Time5-10 min10-20 min1-2 min
Best ForCoaxial, generalOn-wafer, waveguideProduction, speed

Calibration Procedure

A direct phase noise measurement (single-channel) is limited by the phase noise of the reference oscillator: if the reference has -150 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset, the measurement floor at 10 kHz is -150 dBc/Hz (cannot distinguish DUT noise from reference noise). Cross-correlation overcomes this: (1) Two independent reference channels: each has its own LO, mixer, and ADC. The LO noise in channel 1 is independent of the LO noise in channel 2. (2) The DUT noise is common to both channels (it comes from the same source, split by a power divider). (3) Cross-correlation: multiply the two channel outputs and average. The DUT noise (correlated) adds coherently: amplitude grows as N. The reference noise (uncorrelated) adds randomly: amplitude grows as sqrt(N). (4) After N correlations: the effective measurement floor is: L_floor = L_reference - 5×log10(N) dBc/Hz. For L_reference = -150 dBc/Hz and N = 100,000: L_floor = -150 - 25 = -175 dBc/Hz. The measurement time: T = N × (1/f_offset) for the lowest offset frequency. For f_offset = 10 Hz and N = 100,000: T = 100,000 / 10 = 10,000 seconds ≈ 2.8 hours. For f_offset = 10 kHz: T = 10 seconds. The cross-correlation time increases dramatically at lower offset frequencies because the FFT segment length = 1/f_offset.

  • Performance verification: confirm specifications against the application requirements before finalizing the design
  • Environmental factors: temperature range, humidity, and vibration affect long-term reliability and parameter drift
  • Cost vs. performance: evaluate whether the application demands premium components or standard commercial grades
  • Interface compatibility: verify impedance, connector type, and mechanical form factor match the system architecture

Error Sources

(1) Reference oscillator selection: the two reference oscillators should have phase noise at least 10-20 dB below the channel noise floor to avoid systematic errors. In practice: use two identical high-quality oscillators (OCXO, sapphire, or hydrogen maser). Even if each reference has the same phase noise as the DUT: the cross-correlation will eventually converge to the DUT phase noise (just takes more correlations). (2) Power divider: the splitter at the DUT output must provide equal power to both channels with good isolation (> 20 dB) to prevent crosstalk between channels. A degraded isolation creates a correlated leakage path that does not average out, setting a hard measurement floor. (3) ADC requirements: the ADC must have sufficient dynamic range to capture both the carrier (strong) and the phase noise (very weak). For phase noise at -170 dBc/Hz in a 1 Hz bandwidth: the noise is 170 dB below the carrier. A 16-bit ADC has 96 dB dynamic range: the noise is below the ADC quantization floor by 74 dB. The cross-correlation must bring this up. Alternatively: use an analog mixer to downconvert to baseband (removing the carrier) before the ADC, which provides much better dynamic range for the noise sideband. This is the standard approach in dedicated phase noise analyzers.

Common Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

How many correlations do I need?

The number of correlations depends on how far below the single-channel noise floor you need to measure: 10 dB below: N = 100. 20 dB below: N = 10,000. 30 dB below: N = 1,000,000. 40 dB below: N = 100,000,000 (impractically long for most measurements). For a practical example: measuring -170 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset from a 100 MHz OCXO. Single-channel floor: -155 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz (using a good quality reference OCXO). Required improvement: 15 dB → N = 10^(15/5) = 1000 correlations. At 10 kHz offset: T = 1000 / 10000 = 0.1 seconds per correlation × 1000 = 100 seconds ≈ 2 minutes. This is very practical.

What is the advantage over PLL-based phase noise measurement?

PLL-based (phase-locked loop) method: locks a clean reference to the DUT using a PLL, and measures the PLL error voltage (which represents the phase difference). Advantages: simple, one reference needed. Limitations: the reference must have better phase noise than the DUT (by at least 10-20 dB). The PLL bandwidth limits the measurement range (cannot measure at offsets within the PLL bandwidth). Only one PLL time constant can be set, creating a gap in the measurement near the PLL bandwidth. Cross-correlation advantages: no need for a reference better than the DUT (the cross-correlation process separates DUT noise from reference noise). No PLL bandwidth limitation (measures all offset frequencies simultaneously using FFT). Achieves measurement floors of -175 to -185 dBc/Hz (unachievable with PLL methods). The cross-correlation method is universally preferred for precision phase noise measurement.

Can I measure phase noise with a spectrum analyzer?

Yes, using the direct spectrum method: (1) Set the SA center frequency to the DUT carrier frequency. (2) Use a narrow RBW (10 Hz to 1 kHz). (3) Measure the power spectral density at the desired offset: L(f_offset) = P_sideband(dBm/Hz) - P_carrier(dBm). Limitations: (1) The SA LO phase noise must be better than the DUT. The SA LO phase noise is typically -100 to -120 dBc/Hz at 10 kHz offset, which limits the measurement to DUTs with phase noise worse than this. (2) The SA cannot distinguish AM noise from PM noise (measures both). (3) The SA calibration accuracy for noise power density is ±1-2 dB at best. For quick, approximate phase noise measurement: the SA method is acceptable. For precision measurement: use a dedicated phase noise analyzer or cross-correlation system.

Need expert RF components?

Request a Quote

RF Essentials supplies precision components for noise-critical, high-linearity, and impedance-matched systems.

Get in Touch